by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, U.S. G.P.O. in Washington .
Written in English
|LC Classifications||KF27 .E5585 1990k|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||iii, 66 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||66|
|LC Control Number||90602847|
Get this from a library! DOE: pollution at Fernald, Ohio: hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation, Tourism, and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session, on H.R. , H.R. , and H.R. Octo [United States. Congress. House. AIP is to extend agency oversight and review to the EMP activities carried out by and for DOE at Fernald. Results of this new oversight will be periodically reported to DOE, Fernald Environmental Remediation Management Company (FERMCO), and the public. This report does not constitute a complete and comprehensive review of the entire. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (“Ohio EPA”), the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”), and the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) (collectively, the “Trustees”); WHEREAS, the Natural Resource Damage Consent Decree for the Fernald Preserve, dated Novem , required DOE to depositFile Size: KB. Military munitions sites have long been harshly criticized for the way these facilities negatively impact the environment. This paper explains how the United States (US) Department of Energy (DoE) and its project management contractor, Fluor, transformed one of the United States highest pollution-creating munitions facilities--the acre Fernald site (Cincinnati, OH)--into a wetlands dense.
This methodology has been presented at a public meeting in Fernald, Ohio, to solicit public input, and at a DOE pollution prevention conference, and is scheduled to be applied across the FEMP complex. K.L. Yuracko et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 19 () by: O n a sunny Saturday morning, Penny Borgman tells a group of 14 people the story behind the Fernald Preserve, the 1,acre nature area north of Cincinnati that was once the site of a uranium ore processing facility, part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) nuclear weapons program during the Cold War. “Long ago,” she begins, “before European settlers converted this land Author: Jenny Wohlfarth. The year-old plant at Fernald, Ohio, near Cincinnati, processes uranium for use in nuclear weapons and in the Energy Department's military reactors in South Carolina and elsewhere. The plant has been closed since last Friday by a strike over wages and safety. This litigation began in when respondent State of Ohio sued petitioner Department of Energy (DOE) in Federal District Court for violations of state and federal pollution laws, including the CWA and RCRA, in operating its uranium-processing plant in Fernald, Ohio.
The Fernald Community Cohort (FCC) consists of persons who participated in the Fernald Medical Monitoring Program (FMMP) from The FMMP program was funded by a settlement of class action litigation between community residents and National Lead of Ohio, a contractor for the DOE. Fernald, Ohio FDF Subcontract No. 98PC Task Order P U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FERNALD ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT / TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS numbered, dated and signed field book pages shall be given to the Construction Manager weekly, or. Onsite Disposal Facility for Low-level Radioactive Wastes from Fernald D&D Program «All Projects The Feed Production Center at the Fernald site was a uranium processing plant under the Atomic Energy Commission and operated by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) until In , the State of Ohio sued the Department of Energy (DOE) regarding DOE’s operation of a uranium-processing facility in Fernald, Ohio. That case was brought in the United States District Court, where Environmental Defense Section attorney J. Steven Rogers represented DOE.